top | item 31066845 (no title) mr_johnson22 | 3 years ago The real surprise is that Stallman restrained himself from telling the dev that having children is unethical. discuss order hn newest snvzz|3 years ago He can actually keep on topic when it comes to free software.Yet GNU and FSF aren't everything RMS is, so he has his own personal website. I would assume you've learned about his views on having children there. mr_johnson22|3 years ago Yes I have. And my quip was not to criticize his views, but his frequent bluntness in expressing them. filmgirlcw|3 years ago His comments about children were actually expressed in a GNU mailing list, but sure, move those goal posts. GoblinSlayer|3 years ago Why would he? Aren't children free software (if you didn't sell copyright on your DNA)? KennyBlanken|3 years ago [deleted]
snvzz|3 years ago He can actually keep on topic when it comes to free software.Yet GNU and FSF aren't everything RMS is, so he has his own personal website. I would assume you've learned about his views on having children there. mr_johnson22|3 years ago Yes I have. And my quip was not to criticize his views, but his frequent bluntness in expressing them. filmgirlcw|3 years ago His comments about children were actually expressed in a GNU mailing list, but sure, move those goal posts.
mr_johnson22|3 years ago Yes I have. And my quip was not to criticize his views, but his frequent bluntness in expressing them.
filmgirlcw|3 years ago His comments about children were actually expressed in a GNU mailing list, but sure, move those goal posts.
GoblinSlayer|3 years ago Why would he? Aren't children free software (if you didn't sell copyright on your DNA)?
snvzz|3 years ago
Yet GNU and FSF aren't everything RMS is, so he has his own personal website. I would assume you've learned about his views on having children there.
mr_johnson22|3 years ago
filmgirlcw|3 years ago
GoblinSlayer|3 years ago
KennyBlanken|3 years ago
[deleted]