top | item 31094683 (no title) wun0ne | 3 years ago TIL: Being critical of a technology whose fundamental implementation promotes extreme negative externalities is "toxic" discuss order hn newest conqueso|3 years ago The author is well known for being an outspoken critic of crypto. She is speaking to the toxicity of cyber bullying, not criticism itself. caslon|3 years ago The author is incredibly critical of these technologies, and very much does not like them. The article mentions this. bertil|3 years ago I read wun0ne point as how blockchain implementations has a disastrous environmental impact. The article doesn’t mention that at all, and openly advocate for blockchain. load replies (2) WithinReason|3 years ago Proof of work is not fundamental to crypto Tepix|3 years ago What are you referring to? Proof of work destroying our planet? Luckily it is no longer fundamental. See Avalanche consensus etc.
conqueso|3 years ago The author is well known for being an outspoken critic of crypto. She is speaking to the toxicity of cyber bullying, not criticism itself.
caslon|3 years ago The author is incredibly critical of these technologies, and very much does not like them. The article mentions this. bertil|3 years ago I read wun0ne point as how blockchain implementations has a disastrous environmental impact. The article doesn’t mention that at all, and openly advocate for blockchain. load replies (2)
bertil|3 years ago I read wun0ne point as how blockchain implementations has a disastrous environmental impact. The article doesn’t mention that at all, and openly advocate for blockchain. load replies (2)
Tepix|3 years ago What are you referring to? Proof of work destroying our planet? Luckily it is no longer fundamental. See Avalanche consensus etc.
conqueso|3 years ago
caslon|3 years ago
bertil|3 years ago
WithinReason|3 years ago
Tepix|3 years ago