Is there some nuance as to how this is set up? The company buying back the stock when you leave seems particularly interesting: if the valuation has changed in between when you start and when you leave, the company either buys the stock back at the new, higher price (in which case you make some cash on unvested stock) or the company buys it back at the original price, and from a tax perspective you are selling it to them priced under fair market value and the company owes taxes on that I think? Is there something I’m missing?
Swizec|3 years ago
gumby|3 years ago
The point is that whenever you leave you have the same number of shares either way, but this way you pay for them at par (and with 83(b) owe no tax until you sell) and get the LTCG clock started right away. If you pay when you leave you have to pay tax on the delta
This is much friendlier to the the employee, at least when the purchase price is quite low. And why wouldn't I want that for my team?
I've done this with half a dozen companies at least; I don't know why everyone doesn't. The change to the option plan is quite standard and the law firms all know it.
berberous|3 years ago
gumby|3 years ago