(no title)
zaphoyd | 3 years ago
We’ve gotten less spam than I expected and from fewer sources.
The big ones are dropbox (likely breach related), justworks, [email addresses listed in Whois records - note: Whois privacy features are absolutely worth it], and emails associated with open source projects and businesses that get listed in repos/project/business websites.
I have blacklisted 1 video game discussion forum whose owners sold it and all its data and 4-5 misc retailers (mostly in fashion/clothing) for either outright spam or having non-functional un-subscription features.
We continue to use this email strategy for a variety of reasons, not only spam management. I don’t think I would set such a system up if my only goal was spam reduction as breaches and publicly posted addresses account for the vast majority of the spam and those will get you either way. There is merit to having your main personal address be separate from the ones you publically post for business/open source purposes.
As an aside: the experience has led me to an anti-spam idea that I wonder if anyone has tried on a larger scale. I have multiple different addresses that were clearly involved in a breach or I post on public websites where they get scraped. However, I know that both addresses are unrelated to each other so I end up getting listed on some spam lists multiple times. In these cases, any message where you get separate copies to multiple different addresses is spam 100% of the time.
usrusr|3 years ago
My motivation of keeping it up is mostly habit, I wouldn't want shop mails on one of my public addresses anyways. A nice benefit is that phishing mails arriving at the wrong address are even easier to not fall for (but a deeper phishing attempt, with targeting based on a breach or something like that might become easier to fall for)
koolba|3 years ago
I think you just described a bloom filter.
nickm12|3 years ago
Litost|3 years ago