[nilshauk]

I think one such counter-incentive could be, "whatever tech you choose you'll have to live with the consequences by owning maintenance and future development." However, in our fast-paced industry people can switch roles and jobs so quick that they'll never have to face the consequences of their tech-choices.

[yobbo]

> "whatever tech you choose you'll have to live with the consequences by owning maintenance and future development."

But this is not in the interest of "architects", "system owners" or "buyers". They want programmers to be replaceable, not stakeholders.

To "architects", frameworks/libraries make programmers replaceable, and programmers need frameworks/libraries to be marketable.

[nilshauk]

Yeah that makes sense. And “nobody got fired for picking technology X from large company Y”, there’s also that type of thinking.