I thought it was a bit sketchy too and spoke to their support agent about it. It seems this site is run by a partner, SPOT or Service Parts or Tools. Their privacy policy lists servicepartsortools.com as a domain but visiting the domain shows a standard parked domain page. The domain is owned by CTDI[0] which does seem more legitimate. The response I got from the support agent after pressing the issue was:"Apple has partnered with CTDI for the SSR store and the fulfillment of related parts and tools. CTDI will utilize its SPOT subsidiary, including SPOT customer service agents, in support of SSR store customers."
It makes sense that Apple would offload this to someone else, but I agree it's a rather jarring experience.
[0] https://www.ctdi.com
danShumway|3 years ago
It is certainly still a decision to do that. I would guess that for a launch they actually cared about, especially a consumer-facing one, they either would demand to build the website themselves or demand that CTDI follow some design guides. I can't imagine Apple launching their credit card and saying, "okay, Goldman Sachs, you handle everything about branding. The product page for this credit card doesn't need to have Apple in the URL, and doesn't need to follow Apple branding rules" -- because Apple actually cares about getting the word out about the existence of their card, and they actually care about encouraging people to use it.
I don't necessarily think it's some kind of conspiracy to trick people (see TurboTax's shenanigans), but it does speak a lot to their priorities that they do not care about this site looking good or even official, and that they don't think it's important for it to be a recognizable URL or for it to be obvious that it's an official Apple service. None of those things were apparently important enough to get marketing/branding departments involved in the launch.
MikePlacid|3 years ago
OxO4|3 years ago
[0] https://www.blog.google/outreach-initiatives/sustainability/...
[1] https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/1675180/view/4347665...
edrxty|3 years ago
NegativeLatency|3 years ago
ben1040|3 years ago
https://www.ifixit.com/News/58542/working-with-google
skhr0680|3 years ago
status200|3 years ago
overtonwhy|3 years ago
treeman79|3 years ago
They were beyond demanding that everything had to be pixel perfect at all resolutions. Far more then any other client I’ve had.
Was good in that it upped my game, and attention to detail. So I’m grateful for that. But wow was it annoying at the time.
Surprised they let others get away with low quality.
mattl|3 years ago
b3morales|3 years ago