top | item 31207913

(no title)

russianbandit | 3 years ago

And yet coffee shops that claim to be organic, eco conscious and fair trade still penalize you for opting for a milk alternative (by charging extra, like up to $1).

discuss

order

FalconSensei|3 years ago

The milk alternatives that can achieve the same foaminess can cost 2x the price of regular milk, so I guess it makes sense

prideout|3 years ago

Which milk alternatives can achieve the same foaminess?

Workaccount2|3 years ago

As a badly lactose intolerant person, I get that oatmilk is 2x the cost. But please, you are putting in 15 cents of oatmilk, and charging 0.75 to 1.00 extra for it.

A small cup of black coffee with oatmilk for $3.50. Please.

t3rabytes|3 years ago

The markup makes sense for lattes -- 12 ounces of whole milk may be $.36 at retail milk prices, but 12oz of oat milk is closer to $1.50 (see my other comment for the price comparison).

t3rabytes|3 years ago

There's still a rather significant cost difference between the two. In my local market, a one gallon container of whole milk is $3.89 retail, while the barista-blend of Califa Oat Milk is $4.39 for a one quart container (or $4.99 for a half gal of Oatly).

Mikeb85|3 years ago

Because it costs them more.

The fact that it's more ecological to produce doesn't translate to lower prices for many reasons.

goodpoint|3 years ago

How much milk goes in a coffee cup? 5c more at industrial price.

mikepurvis|3 years ago

Not really super surprising— the volumes are way lower and there's less subsidizing going on. On a grocery store shelf here in Ontario, you can get 4L of 2% regular milk for $5. But the Earth's Own products, which include oat and soy milk? Those are more like $6 for a single litre.

bipson|3 years ago

As an European I am always baffled by the humongous containers you have overseas.

Here we buy litres or half, and we adore milk, mostly 3.5%. The non-diary alternatives are not even allowed to be called milk (they are now drinks).

oh_sigh|3 years ago

Beyond the cost from the supplier, perhaps because there is a greater overhead associated with supplying that milk to a minority of customers. If everyone was drinking oat milk by default I don't think there would be a $1 upcharge.

honkycat|3 years ago

it costs more... but only because the dairy industry is heavily subsidized.

Sure we're burning down the planet and allocating massive amounts of water to feed and maintain livestock during drought conditions.

BUT! The ranchers need their 5th house and the proles need their artificially cheap meat that is blocking their arteries.

( not a vegan just annoyed by mis-allocation of resources )

micromacrofoot|3 years ago

they'd roughly cost the same if not for dairy subsidies

bipson|3 years ago

Still absurd.

The amount of oat you have to feed a cow to get a single litre is not even close to the literal handful you need for an oat-based milk - let alone the time and how of work that went into caring for the cows, handling the mess, etc.

It should not even be close. We simply industrialized the whole diary thing, and consider it essential.

And I say this as someone who cannot live without cheese. It should just be way more expensive and reflect the cost it has on the environment/society.