[salamander014]

I try to subscribe to the idea that if you cannot adequately describe your commit in a small number of characters (~50 is plenty I feel), your commit is likely too complicated. One size does not fit all, and if a workflow ain't broken there's usually no need to fix it. However most workflows are imperfect, there is almost always room for improvement.

But in the general case I find that if commits are not themselves concise and simple changes, they often should be broken up so that the moving pieces can be better tracked when looking back at the history.