It really is infuriating how unnecessarily expensive and confusing Microsoft has made creating and exchanging simple document files. I talk to people all the time that are unsure about how they'll edit their resume on a new system or think they'll need a new copy of Office to update a file on their new computer (and then they're confused as to what version to buy). It's amazing how few normal people know about Google Docs - Google should really be pushing this on consumers more.
Microsoft might have made a lot of money off of this confusion, but in the process they've become the antithesis of "it just works" in a lot of people's eyes. They've made some of the most basic functions of computing an expensive pain in the ass for most of the PC era.
"...Linux’s Ubuntu operating system comes for free and requires no updates, upgrades or expensive antivirus software to keep the laptop in shape. ..."
This is not completely true since Ubuntu does provide (various software) updates and upgrades.
"... The proximity of the Clintons and the Gates is well known to the world and needs no explanation. ... And the revelations of WikiLeaks only show how the US has been forcing governments across the world to buy expensive Microsoft licenses."
Really? That statement seems a little outrageous.
Ultimately, as the article highlights, why are states "...moving back to laptops for poor rural students preloaded with Microsoft Windows."?
Does a computer preloaded with Microsoft Windows provide a significant advantage over a Linux distribution? For example, what is the goal of providing computer to poor rural students? Is it to make them computer proficient or Microsoft Office proficient?
(Also, presumably, these low-cost computers (provided to poor rural students) are not capable to run Windows 7 or Windows 8 - what version of Microsoft Windows is preloaded?)
As for your argument, "computer proficient" versus "microsoft office proficient" .. there is a lot more you can do with a computer besides word-process documents, in spite of what Microsoft want you to think^Wbuy^Wconsume ..
And what is the goal, well in the short term it is surely to make them more employable and the jobs requiring say Excel outnumber those requiring C++ 100:1.
>> For example, what is the goal of providing computer to poor rural students? Is it to make them computer proficient or Microsoft Office proficient?
I am no Microsoft supporter, but you have asked an important question here: If the long-term goal is to teach them Office, so that they can do administrative tasks etc. at their future workplaces (which are probably running Office2k on WinXP, based on my [anecdotal] observations), then Windows+Office training might actually be useful to them. Not everyone is being trained to become a programmer.
>This is not completely true since Ubuntu does provide (various software) updates and upgrades.
They probably meant that a major upgrade won't be needed to be paid for.
Anyway this is Tehelka, one of the big 'rags' in India, so don't expect any kind of objectivity or even truth from them. They will print anything if it drives interest.
The article says that over the next 5 years, about 7 Million laptops will be purchased. The price of windows mentioned in the article is about $110 at current rates, which means $770 million order for MS. That definitely is a big order for MS, considering the full laptop is only expected to cost ~$300.
I really can't see any good reason to spend that money to put windows in laptops for poor children. It would be much wiser to use linux and buy more laptops.
No way this is right. $100 for Windows 7 Starter Edition? Not a chance. W7 Starter probably wouldn't cost that much retail, and there's no way OEMs are paying that much. I've read that HP/Dell/etc pay more like $25-$30 for Home
Premium, which is several tiers above Starter.
Just so you know, I work for Microsoft, but not on Windows. I have no inside knowledge of Windows OEM pricing, but I'd be very surprised if Starter cost an OEM more than $5-$10.
Too much "the IT intelligentsia", "not offend one of the world’s most profitable and powerful corporations", "the future of computing", "The proximity of the Clintons and the Gates is well known to the world and needs no explanation" for me to take the article seriously.
A bad defense of free and open-source software is not always better than no defense.
I rolled my eyes too, but the next three paragraphs put it in a reasonable light.
Two cables, one originating in the embassy at Hanoi and the other at the embassy in Tunis, throw enough light on the scale and nature of the government-corporation nexus in the United States and its influence on world governments.
According to one of the cables, the US government ‘intervened’ to force Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dzung to sign an agreement with Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer that would require Hanoi to pay Microsoft $20 million for 3 lakh licences. This even though the Vietnamese PM wanted to hold the Microsoft deal as a deliverable till he met the US president later that year.
Now put that deal in an Indian context where 68 lakh licences would be required under Jayalalithaa’s ambitious free laptop scheme and the business of diplomacy becomes clear. The Microsoft deal of 3 lakh licences was dubbed in the cable as ‘the most significant agreement Vietnam has ever signed with a US business’.
"Microsoft representatives also highlighted their
concerns about recent GVN comments that it plans to switch
to open source software (like Linux) to "fix" its IPR
problems. While acknowledging that the decision on what
type of software the GVN wants to use is up to the
Government... Switching to open source does not insulate the
GVN from the responsibility of ensuring that all software
used by the GVN is legitimately licensed, Microsoft asserted"
It sounds like they know how to throw their weight around in the developing world.
I use MS as well as nix depending, and I do agree that this scenario has simple, clear cut advantages to use nix. That being said, this article just made me feel dirty. I don't know why people have to overstate a point or politicize everything.
One of the things that makes a typical Linux install better is the preconfigured programming environments on it such as Perl or Python.
Unlike Windows 7. It would be so nice if Microsoft installed Visual Basic Express on all Windows as a matter of course.
(Of course, this carries with it the presumption that creation is better than consumption, and to really use a computer, you need to be able to program it).
Some key points from the article.
The first requirement was " A dual boot system that had free open source Linux with the proprietary Microsoft Windows starter edition with antivirus software valid for a year."
The second requirement was "In its new tender, ELCOT asked bidders to provide only Microsoft Windows and removed Linux from the list."
And a key point made from someone from ELCOT: " “We will retain dual boot laptops to ensure uniformity in the supply of laptops by different vendors,"
Windows was always going to be on the laptops. More than likely, the vendors charge more for setting up dual boot systems.
Sensationalism aside, reducing HDD capacity by half, removing wifi, removing a whole bunch of educational software just to pay for Windows? Just. Wrong.
EDIT: Although, I don't completely buy the argument about upgrades. I still have laptops running Windows XP that work great.
[+] [-] saturdaysaint|14 years ago|reply
Microsoft might have made a lot of money off of this confusion, but in the process they've become the antithesis of "it just works" in a lot of people's eyes. They've made some of the most basic functions of computing an expensive pain in the ass for most of the PC era.
[+] [-] exit|14 years ago|reply
it doesn't seem to let me export my revision history, for example.
also, does it actually offer a download format such that:
"google docs" -> "download as" -> "upload to google docs"
returns you to exactly the same document?
[+] [-] 127001brewer|14 years ago|reply
This is not completely true since Ubuntu does provide (various software) updates and upgrades.
"... The proximity of the Clintons and the Gates is well known to the world and needs no explanation. ... And the revelations of WikiLeaks only show how the US has been forcing governments across the world to buy expensive Microsoft licenses."
Really? That statement seems a little outrageous.
Ultimately, as the article highlights, why are states "...moving back to laptops for poor rural students preloaded with Microsoft Windows."?
Does a computer preloaded with Microsoft Windows provide a significant advantage over a Linux distribution? For example, what is the goal of providing computer to poor rural students? Is it to make them computer proficient or Microsoft Office proficient?
(Also, presumably, these low-cost computers (provided to poor rural students) are not capable to run Windows 7 or Windows 8 - what version of Microsoft Windows is preloaded?)
Edit: Updated styling.
[+] [-] seclorum|14 years ago|reply
*Really? That statement seems a little outrageous.
Not outrageous at all:
http://c4sif.org/2011/08/wikileaks-cable-shows-us-twisting-a...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Tunisia_Scandal
http://homembit.com/2011/09/microsofts-attack-on-brazilian-n...
.. and so on.
As for your argument, "computer proficient" versus "microsoft office proficient" .. there is a lot more you can do with a computer besides word-process documents, in spite of what Microsoft want you to think^Wbuy^Wconsume ..
[+] [-] brudgers|14 years ago|reply
Also, Ubuntu's support cycle is also much shorter (18-36 months v Windows 60-120 months) making standardization and support more difficult.
[+] [-] gaius|14 years ago|reply
And what is the goal, well in the short term it is surely to make them more employable and the jobs requiring say Excel outnumber those requiring C++ 100:1.
[+] [-] tsycho|14 years ago|reply
I am no Microsoft supporter, but you have asked an important question here: If the long-term goal is to teach them Office, so that they can do administrative tasks etc. at their future workplaces (which are probably running Office2k on WinXP, based on my [anecdotal] observations), then Windows+Office training might actually be useful to them. Not everyone is being trained to become a programmer.
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] recoiledsnake|14 years ago|reply
They probably meant that a major upgrade won't be needed to be paid for.
Anyway this is Tehelka, one of the big 'rags' in India, so don't expect any kind of objectivity or even truth from them. They will print anything if it drives interest.
[+] [-] WilhelmJ|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] danmaz74|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dpark|14 years ago|reply
Just so you know, I work for Microsoft, but not on Windows. I have no inside knowledge of Windows OEM pricing, but I'd be very surprised if Starter cost an OEM more than $5-$10.
[+] [-] rbanffy|14 years ago|reply
A bad defense of free and open-source software is not always better than no defense.
[+] [-] saturdaysaint|14 years ago|reply
Two cables, one originating in the embassy at Hanoi and the other at the embassy in Tunis, throw enough light on the scale and nature of the government-corporation nexus in the United States and its influence on world governments.
According to one of the cables, the US government ‘intervened’ to force Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dzung to sign an agreement with Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer that would require Hanoi to pay Microsoft $20 million for 3 lakh licences. This even though the Vietnamese PM wanted to hold the Microsoft deal as a deliverable till he met the US president later that year.
Now put that deal in an Indian context where 68 lakh licences would be required under Jayalalithaa’s ambitious free laptop scheme and the business of diplomacy becomes clear. The Microsoft deal of 3 lakh licences was dubbed in the cable as ‘the most significant agreement Vietnam has ever signed with a US business’.
The wikileak in question is pretty damning - http://www.cablegatesearch.net/cable.php?id=04HANOI966
"Microsoft representatives also highlighted their concerns about recent GVN comments that it plans to switch to open source software (like Linux) to "fix" its IPR problems. While acknowledging that the decision on what type of software the GVN wants to use is up to the Government... Switching to open source does not insulate the GVN from the responsibility of ensuring that all software used by the GVN is legitimately licensed, Microsoft asserted"
It sounds like they know how to throw their weight around in the developing world.
[+] [-] gospelwut|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pnathan|14 years ago|reply
Unlike Windows 7. It would be so nice if Microsoft installed Visual Basic Express on all Windows as a matter of course.
(Of course, this carries with it the presumption that creation is better than consumption, and to really use a computer, you need to be able to program it).
[+] [-] Delmania|14 years ago|reply
The second requirement was "In its new tender, ELCOT asked bidders to provide only Microsoft Windows and removed Linux from the list."
And a key point made from someone from ELCOT: " “We will retain dual boot laptops to ensure uniformity in the supply of laptops by different vendors,"
Windows was always going to be on the laptops. More than likely, the vendors charge more for setting up dual boot systems.
[+] [-] tejaswiy|14 years ago|reply
EDIT: Although, I don't completely buy the argument about upgrades. I still have laptops running Windows XP that work great.