top | item 31284887

(no title)

nmyk | 3 years ago

While it makes sense that the police would unionize for the same reason any other workers would, your second paragraph seems to contradict your first.

Your proposal to shift responsibility for "policing the police" up to elected officials means weakening police unions, does it not? Is there a political body out there that's even more fundamentally in support of police autonomy than police unions?

discuss

order

apwheele|3 years ago

I don't see a conflict, unions would still be obligated to represent officers. It is just criminal behavior investigations would be shifted entirely to the DAs office (to prevent Joe from investigating his friend Bob).

Also an FYI police cannot strike! See https://grahamfactor.substack.com/p/im-sticking-to-the-polic... for an overview.