This is something that's been going on for a while - Google killing small web apps; Convertors, calculators, movie listings, ip finders, weather stats, stocks. It's not all low-hanging fruit. I'm not saying they shouldn't be doing this, nor that it's intentional. Their goal is to be the best search engine which means connecting searchers with answers as quickly as they can. But even so, it sucks for the web apps who get made redundant by Google.
Also, it's interesting to compare this with, say, Yahoo's approach. Yahoo would have put an "IP" widget and a "weather" widget on their portal homepage. Google waits until the user searches for the info before giving it to them - which keeps their homepage clean and more importantly keeps their message strong "we do search well", while Yahoo's always seemed to be "we do a whole bunch of stuff, some of which you may need". I know Google/Yahoo comparisons aren't really du jour, but still it's interesting.
Actually the only way for a "my IP" application to make some money is be indexed as first result in Google I guess. At least I never remember the domain of one of that 200 trivial apps and search on google. So makes a lot of sense they showing you the result if you search for "ip" or "my ip".
with the more significant things like movie listings, weather..... it's about Google + the world's information. They want it to flow through them/be indexed by them/found and offered up by them
DDG in general seems to do a much better job of second-guessing what I'm looking for. Amazing how good it's become and that Google is (in my experience at least) playing catch-up.
Remember, if the answer is delivered with HTTP, the reported IP may be the IP of your ISP's transparent proxy server. If you want the IP of your NAT box, you need a what-is-my-IP where the response is delivered over HTTPS.
This seems like a case of some things being features, not applications. Entire web sites build just to report your IP back were probably going to be replaced by one thing or another, eventually.
Both Google and Apple (and most other companies) are smart enough to see that if a simple feature is heavily used and the experience of using it can be improved for their users, they may want to make it a "native" part of their products. Let's face it, this is a better experience for that search, and you can still go to the indie sites if what you need isn't covered by it.
If your site is so sparse that Google can ruin you just by handling a search query, your business model was broken or non-existent. There must be something they can do with all that traffic data to differentiate. Where's the aggregate statistics?
Any of the bigger ones could spring off into an ISP review site.
Ok, so I have a curl/awk one-liner that can get me my ip in shell scripts that uses checkip.dyndns.org. It's super simple because the results are super simple from checkip.
Anyone want to take a stab at this for google's result page?
Wow, like the IPv6 anf IPv4 breakdown along with ISP information. Wolfram would win, but as usual you can't scrape it with the SED tricks of earlier posts... or can you?
I recently noticed that searching for dictionary words, using the old define:something trick or queries like "ubuntu release day", "evanscence genre" returns related information or 'best guess'. Nifty.
I'm slightly amazed at how inconsistent these special queries work. For international users (I simply assume it's not just me), this trick only works if I add &hl=en to the URL. Any explanations?
[+] [-] user24|14 years ago|reply
Also, it's interesting to compare this with, say, Yahoo's approach. Yahoo would have put an "IP" widget and a "weather" widget on their portal homepage. Google waits until the user searches for the info before giving it to them - which keeps their homepage clean and more importantly keeps their message strong "we do search well", while Yahoo's always seemed to be "we do a whole bunch of stuff, some of which you may need". I know Google/Yahoo comparisons aren't really du jour, but still it's interesting.
[+] [-] biot|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] antirez|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ChrisArchitect|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] markmccraw|14 years ago|reply
I await the day I can anagram via the search bar.
[+] [-] keeperofdakeys|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Urgo|14 years ago|reply
http://www.google.com/search?q=ip
[+] [-] darkstar999|14 years ago|reply
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ip
[+] [-] tagawa|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shrikant|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] RyanKearney|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] lacker|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] billpg|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] blacksmith_tb|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] molo_|14 years ago|reply
-molo
[+] [-] tomkarlo|14 years ago|reply
Both Google and Apple (and most other companies) are smart enough to see that if a simple feature is heavily used and the experience of using it can be improved for their users, they may want to make it a "native" part of their products. Let's face it, this is a better experience for that search, and you can still go to the indie sites if what you need isn't covered by it.
[+] [-] Splines|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chaosfox|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] larryw|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shrikant|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] josephb|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rekoros|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vnuk|14 years ago|reply
http://imgur.com/t9jA6
[+] [-] mkr-hn|14 years ago|reply
Any of the bigger ones could spring off into an ISP review site.
[+] [-] noonespecial|14 years ago|reply
Anyone want to take a stab at this for google's result page?
[+] [-] fjarlq|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] a3_nm|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Nick_C|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bostonvaulter2|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ralph|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nodata|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 27182818284|14 years ago|reply
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=what+is+my+ip
[+] [-] shrikant|14 years ago|reply
http://i.imgur.com/uXBJk.jpg
Edit: I knew that IP looked familiar - this is likely because of the Modify Headers Firefox add-on. Oh well, still broken.
[+] [-] hieronymusN|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] treelovinhippie|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] icandoitbetter|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] RyanMcGreal|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chanux|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stewbrew|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] beaumartinez|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] martokus|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rl1987|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] robryan|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ConstantineXVI|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ralph|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] _grrr|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] icebraining|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] acg|14 years ago|reply