Using Harvard as an example, they had an operating expenses of $5.0 billion in 2021 [1]. In order to cover that, they would need to be having a consistent rate of return around 9% on their ($54 billion) endowment. That a fairly good estimate of the rate of return for the stock market over the past 25 years, so not unreasonable. Though, this ignores that most of the endowment consists of restricted funds that can only be used on certain ways. Also, generally you need to cut a few percentage points if you want to guard against inflation.So yes, Harvard could cover just about all of their budget with the endowment returns, though they probably need some extra income to cover the holes formed by the restricted funds and avoid inflation pressure.
Is their current usage of the returns too conservative? Probably. Do they have an absurdly large pile of cash that they have no business holding on to? Not really; the investment returns roughly correspond with their current operating costs.
[^1] https://finance.harvard.edu/financial-overview
tallanvor|3 years ago
laGrenouille|3 years ago
I was only using the more aggressive number as a thought experiment to the original poster about what it would take the cover the entire operating budget.
pastacacioepepe|3 years ago
gruez|3 years ago
This comparison makes no sense.
1. GDP is a per-year measure, but an endowment is accumulated over multiple years. Therefore durectly comparing them doesn't really make much sense.
2. "some nation" includes some pretty small/poor countries. Should it be a surprise that an organization in the US is bigger than a country like Liechtenstein?
chrisseaton|3 years ago
It’s not sitting there - it’s invested and working. Investment returns pay for operating expenses.
DiggyJohnson|3 years ago
LudwigNagasena|3 years ago
Isn’t that a crazy number? How much of it goes to a bloated bureaucracy?
troupe|3 years ago