(no title)
wenbo | 3 years ago
I believe this is you: https://github.com/supabase/supabase/discussions/5911#discus.... I just want to let you know that I saw your comment!
Thank you so much for the kind words!
> 2) Recently added built-in database-driven GraphQL module is ingenious, but would benefit greatly from Realtime capability
A member of the team is currently investigating this so please stay tuned.
I'll pass on the rest of your feedback internally. Thanks again!
dinvlad|3 years ago
Also, for systems like Firebase, it's possible to mint a custom token based on the (locally verified) uid and additional JWT claims. This still requires implementing a (small) endpoint to do that, though. But that's a bit orthogonal to the signature algorithm choice.
The third part that remains unsolved is OIDC federation - so for example, I could exchange a JWK-signed Supabase token for a Google IAM token, based on its public JWKS endpoint.
Another unsolved concern I haven't mentioned is obviously from standpoint of security, sharing a symmetric key is "dangerous" because it could leak (and requires a sensitive context for verification).