Funny thing is that I guarantee a lot of the parents in support of dumb shit like this lose their minds at sexual education classes in public schools. Just shows that most people don't have the IQ necessary to be competent parents.
If you lose your mind about a sexual education class, I agree that's misguided, but saying they have a low IQ because of that? Maybe a low EQ if they can't control their emotions, but it's absurd to automatically equate emotions with intelligence. We've all acted stupidly because we've been emotionally invested in an idea. To pretend otherwise is disingenuous at best, and probably indicative of a low IQ at worst ;)
Anyways, lots of people and religions have wildly different ideas on the sanctity (or lack of sanctity) of sex. Some people don't like it when a public school decides to teach their child something different. Whether that's a school teaching that heterosexual monogamy is the one true way, or homosexualism or polygamy or whatever. People have very different opinions on this and that's OK.
Don't think you got my point. I'd wager most parents that don't like sexual education courses don't see the hypocrisy in supporting this bill. They're essentially letting the state do the parenting for them.
good luck teaching much beyond colors and shapes without overlapping with some "Republican ideals" or "Democrat ideals". especially given the ever-widening scope of what so many Republicans claim constitutes Democratic political indoctrination in schools.
_gabe_|3 years ago
Anyways, lots of people and religions have wildly different ideas on the sanctity (or lack of sanctity) of sex. Some people don't like it when a public school decides to teach their child something different. Whether that's a school teaching that heterosexual monogamy is the one true way, or homosexualism or polygamy or whatever. People have very different opinions on this and that's OK.
JohnWhigham|3 years ago
bbor|3 years ago
[deleted]
RobertRoberts|3 years ago
1) We should have school districts teaching _Republican_ ideals because the local schools support it.
2) We should have school districts teaching _Democrat_ ideals because the local schools support it.
3) No to both 1 and 2.
You simply can't have it both ways, therefore the reasonable option is to say no to both.
veilrap|3 years ago
When facts get labeled as bias it's impossible to remove both from the classroom and still have a functional classroom.
freemint|3 years ago
vineyardmike|3 years ago
mbg721|3 years ago
joe5150|3 years ago
8note|3 years ago
3) is then a contradiction, in that there is nothing that could be taught, since everything is either republican ideals or not-republican ideals
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]