top | item 31350750

(no title)

davidweatherall | 3 years ago

I don't understand how you bodge a stable coin startup.

Surely you just mint the tokens in exchange for dollars, and then put ~50% of the dollars in zero risk investments (some form of treasury bonds), and then take the 0.5-1% interest per year as your revenue. Tether currently has $81b marketcap so you could be making $400-800m per year doing basically nothing?

discuss

order

likpok|3 years ago

It’s hard to find a bank to take your money, since you’re something that rhymes with money laundering. Tether had a bunch of money stolen from them because the money launderer they used turned out to be a crook.

It also takes a long time to get this going and there are moderately high costs to a minimally viable financial entity (reporting, compliance). A few years ago they only had a couple billion which makes it hard.

And all of that sets aside the allegation that tether has been printing tethers it’s entire life — that it’s basically never been fully backed by dollars.

mewse|3 years ago

> something that rhymes with money laundering

Oo, sign me up for some "bunny conjuring", please!

Alternately, "sunny wandering" and "honey squandering" both sound like they could be delightful ways to pass an afternoon. But I can tell you right now that "funny pondering" is hella overrated.

pjc50|3 years ago

> Surely you just mint the tokens in exchange for dollars

Step 1: find someone willing to give you dollars in exchange for a token that's guaranteed to be worth something between 0 and 1 dollars.

Step 2: find a bank willing to let you be a money transmitter for millions of anonymous pseudo-dollars whose owner you have no idea of, setting off every single money laundering alarm in the building.

ckastner|3 years ago

> Step 2: find a bank willing to let you be a money transmitter for millions of anonymous pseudo-dollars whose owner you have no idea of, setting off every single money laundering alarm in the building.

This was the biggest red flag behind Tether to me, where we are talking about not millions but billions of pseudo-dollars.

The risk profile is beyond anything reasonable that a bank could or would accept. Tether minting $2bn in a week means $2bn cash inflows from mostly people that the bank probably doesn't know, all for what can only be a negligible fee.

thebean11|3 years ago

Coinbase and Circle were certainly able to pull off both steps for USDC. They require KYC to purchase USDC from them, or redeem USDC for USD. USDC can be traded on the secondary market without KYC.

closedloop129|3 years ago

A slightly better strategy:

You do exactly this, but you don't proof it to anybody. Then there is constant doubt and the price can fall down a bit, e.g. to 0.97.

Then, you buy back your stable coins and you make an additional nice profit.

As long as there is no other more trusted stable coin demand will increase again and you will regain your market share.

ForHackernews|3 years ago

Great, you've invented a boring old bank. That's not innovation. (Well, technically an unlicensed wildcat bank, but still)

Literally the only new thing about blockchains is an ecologically destructive brute-force solution to the byzantine generals problem. However, it turns out nobody except CS students cares much about that, so they have to dress it up with cartoon apes and web3 buzzwords.

vineyardmike|3 years ago

It’s also a bank with low Tx fees and fast Tx at any time of day, anywhere in the world. Something that is bafflingly still hard to find.

andy81|3 years ago

Anyone making $500m/year legit could rug for $20bn+, so they walk away before that point.

Tether have a great business model but seem to spend 90% of their time falsifying reserves instead. It certainly gives the impression they're planning on taking the capital rather than interest. They're already in breach of the NYAG agreement, with three+ more cases pending.

It actually seems like a great project for e.g. Fidelity or Vanguard to set up a mutual fund that doesn't pay interest. With the name recognition it would be immediate #1 stablecoin assuming they offered the same level of audit scrutiny and reserves breakdown as their other products (i.e. 100x anything offered in the cryptocurrency space currently).

raverbashing|3 years ago

> I don't understand how you bodge a stable coin startup.

You're assuming "bodging" wasn't part of the plan all along