This is getting silly. Lock screens are the security equivalent of having a screen door. They exist to keep the mildly annoying things out, but they're not designed to prevent the real baddies.
Breaking with metaphor, I don't consider it much of a security flaw if step one is the other person has to have physical access to the device.
Isn't it trivial to "fix" this by just disabling smart-cover unlocking? Isn't that exactly why this is a user-enabled feature of the smart cover?
It isn't that I oppose viewing this as a "bug" (obviously the user is led to believe that a password in and of itself would prevent this), but I would think that anyone security-conscious enough to have a password should be disabling smart cover unlocking anyway...
I largely agree. That said, it is a weird default, as if you've never owned a smart cover, it might not occur to you that there is a setting relating to it you don't want that is defaulted to on. I mean, it seems fair to me that someone who is "security-conscious" shouldn't be forced to examine every single option on the device looking for a painfully insecure default.
This is typical of Apple, though: it is also fun to carry around an Apple Remote if you know people with MacBooks. You walk up behind them, hit the menu button, and yell "FRONT ROW!", at which point their computer (default setting: accept any random remote) will /slowly/ fade to black, and then /slowly/ fade into a TV-like UI the user has probably never seen before.
Did you watch the video? This is definitely a bug, seeing as it only happens when you have the shutdown panel open. When you don't have the shutdown panel open, it shows the password prompt as expected. There's no reason that smart cover unlocking and a password prompt can't co-exist.
So let me straight, being the first one a setting it wasn't a vulnerability, instead this one is. I can't see the logic behind their reasoning, in my opinion they are both superficial security policies (ie. badly set defaults)
[+] [-] scott_s|14 years ago|reply
Breaking with metaphor, I don't consider it much of a security flaw if step one is the other person has to have physical access to the device.
[+] [-] VMG|14 years ago|reply
I can't see why you can't make an iPad everything-but-screwdriver-proof.
[+] [-] antimora|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] icarus_drowning|14 years ago|reply
It isn't that I oppose viewing this as a "bug" (obviously the user is led to believe that a password in and of itself would prevent this), but I would think that anyone security-conscious enough to have a password should be disabling smart cover unlocking anyway...
[+] [-] saurik|14 years ago|reply
This is typical of Apple, though: it is also fun to carry around an Apple Remote if you know people with MacBooks. You walk up behind them, hit the menu button, and yell "FRONT ROW!", at which point their computer (default setting: accept any random remote) will /slowly/ fade to black, and then /slowly/ fade into a TV-like UI the user has probably never seen before.
[+] [-] kalleboo|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] xuki|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Groxx|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] X-Istence|14 years ago|reply
That being said, just disable the unlock with smart cover and problem solved.
[+] [-] dbtc|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] xuki|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dvdhsu|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikemoka|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Curbob|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pyre|14 years ago|reply