[sprucely]

I wish I had your experience with Kaiser. I've hit that conflict of interest multiple times. Most recently, after going through triage and waiting six weeks for an appointment, and after half way through it with [specialist], I learn that they're actually not the specialist I thought I was getting and just performing triage. This person lacked even basic knowledge on the topic, and none of the classes or groups she can find actually address the issue in question. When our time is almost up she finally decides to lookup a specialist. There's only one available with only one date available in another couple months. But she's only looking in one geographical region because she doesn't have access to data for the other region that can also serve us. If I book this appointment, she informs me I won't be able to find another specialist in the other region because a patient can be assigned to only one specialist. So it seems data actually is integrated across Kaiser's "regions", but only so far as to support their bottom line.

[dekhn]

Kaiser doesn't have a "bottom line" to support. North and South Kaiser are two completely different orgs, but they both use the same EHR technology and can move records between them with no real friction.

[sprucely]

They may not have a bottom line, but they certainly put up barriers to accessing specialty care that I never experienced when using the Sutter/Blue Shield combo. Also this wasn't a North Kaiser vs South Kaiser thing. More like Solano vs Yolo/Sacramento counties.