[kite_and_code]

I can totally relate that finding a suitable open-source business model is a fuzzy journey.

Nevertheless, from the user perspective I would love to hear a more clear answer - at least for e.g. the next 6-12 months.

Currently, it seems like you are tolerating usage inside the cloud providers without taking a clear stance. I think this creates fear, uncertainty, doubt and slows down mito adoption within the cloud.

I would appreciate a clear statement in the near future around your thinking on how mito should be made available in those environments. After all, the clouds are an environment to where more and more users are migrating to. Or at least use it in parallel to local setups.

I can understand if you don't want to answer on the spot in case you don't have a clear stance yet. In this case, please take your time and let us know when you made your decision.

Really love what you're doing and the innovation that you are pushing for! <3

[narush]

Oh, sorry I wasn't clear! We totally expect that users will use Mito in notebooks on the cloud cloud, and we are in support of this usage!

Ideally, we will continue to extend our support to these environments over time, as currently there are lots of environments where users want Mito but we don't support it yet (notebooks api differences, etc) - a good example being AWS Sagemaker.

I'll edit my answer above to be more clear about this as well. Thanks for the ask for clarification!