it always comes back to the same argument: crypto is bad because a couple centralized companies handle this all for us just fine, and people in some countries already have great interbank transfers.
also please lose the ad hominem, it is not needed.
> it always comes back to the same argument: crypto is bad because
No it always comes to the same argument: crypto bros argue that traditional finance is bad and their claims get refuted again, and again, and again, until they fall back to the same old tired "but what of the unbanked?!"
No. Crypto will not save the unbanked.
> also please lose the ad hominem, it is not needed.
dmitriid|3 years ago
No it always comes to the same argument: crypto bros argue that traditional finance is bad and their claims get refuted again, and again, and again, until they fall back to the same old tired "but what of the unbanked?!"
No. Crypto will not save the unbanked.
> also please lose the ad hominem, it is not needed.
There was literally no ad hominem.