Kind of reminded me of the traditional wisdom that you should select chains and sprocket to avoid patterned wear. I don't know if there is an effect (especially with bikes and their low torque),but I always think about it when changing my chain. I suppose this only applies to single sprocket bike.
jstanley|3 years ago
In gears, if you make sure the number of teeth of mating gears is coprime then you wear the teeth of one gear evenly against the other gear. If there are low factors, then each tooth of one gear only engages with a small number of teeth on the other gear, exacerbating wear.
With belts, if the number of teeth on the belt shares low factors with the number of teeth on either of the pulleys then you get the same effect: any given tooth on the belt only ever meshes with a small number of teeth on the pulley.
dredmorbius|3 years ago
Usually contrasted against the decidedly non-prime 52 (2 * 2 * 13) and 42 (2 * 3 * 7) chainrings. 38 if you're old-school triple (2 * 2 * 7).
My chain lengths would vary and I never counted them specifically, though I'd typically remove a few links for fit.
fyhn|3 years ago
analog31|3 years ago
I ride 46:19, because those are the parts that were in my bin when I built the bike, and it's a pretty good all-round ratio for city riding unless you're a lot more athletic than I am.
Also, those components wear out soon enough anyway -- a chain lasts 2 to 3 thousand miles, and a cog lasts a few chains.
namdnay|3 years ago