top | item 31599346 (no title) TwelveNights | 3 years ago I've always thought that Twitter adopted the same line of thinking, preventing tweets from being editable. discuss order hn newest jedberg|3 years ago I think it twitter's case it was architectural. By treating tweets as immutable the could publish them on a pipeline and not worry about duplicate copies around the system being out of sync. mattnewton|3 years ago That and early on it used sms as one of the interfaces, which is not editable. load replies (1) fortran77|3 years ago It's to prevent tweeting "LIKE this if you like Ice Cream" and then editing it to say "LIKE this if you like pedophilia"Nobody would ever Like/Retweet anything if it could be changed later.
jedberg|3 years ago I think it twitter's case it was architectural. By treating tweets as immutable the could publish them on a pipeline and not worry about duplicate copies around the system being out of sync. mattnewton|3 years ago That and early on it used sms as one of the interfaces, which is not editable. load replies (1)
mattnewton|3 years ago That and early on it used sms as one of the interfaces, which is not editable. load replies (1)
fortran77|3 years ago It's to prevent tweeting "LIKE this if you like Ice Cream" and then editing it to say "LIKE this if you like pedophilia"Nobody would ever Like/Retweet anything if it could be changed later.
jedberg|3 years ago
mattnewton|3 years ago
fortran77|3 years ago
Nobody would ever Like/Retweet anything if it could be changed later.