(no title)
talove
|
3 years ago
FWIW, the electronic drivetrains are superior in just about every performance metric, aside from needing to be charged every few weeks. You might not want an tablet computer in your refrigerator door but electronic bike shifting is more akin to going from carbureted to fuel injected engines, it is the more reliable and tunable of the two options.
TheCondor|3 years ago
This simply isn’t true, across the board they are heavier. Satellite shifter are wonderful, but that’s not a performance metric. Also, fwiw, races have been lost due to shifting power being out and being stuck in a gear. Rigo Uran stands out, a few years back at the Tour.
I’m not a hater, I have some electronic shifting in my stable.
Editing, I was misremembering my gruppo weights, they are on parity.
petre|3 years ago
In addition to a mechanical now one might have an electronical. I hate tuning my mech shifters, but Di2 cable routing inside the frame, seatpost batteries? No thanx. I hope it has improved since the seatpost battery days.
taude|3 years ago
loeg|3 years ago
caycep|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
jskrablin|3 years ago
I understand that some people get excited about just any $shinynewtoy but unless you're in a position to take measurable performance gain out of it... it's really just a $shinynewtoy. There's a lot more performance to be gained with improving the rider, losing weight, etc.
Or maybe just stop being obsessed by specs, performance, results, comparing oneself to others and just start to enjoy riding.
ubermonkey|3 years ago
Once you ride electronic shifting, it's hard to go back. It's really nice, really stable, and on the whole I've had much fewer issues with eTap than I had with mechanical Ultegra.
kleinsch|3 years ago