(no title)
rckoepke | 3 years ago
I'm certain someone in say, China or Russia, could pirate the database and run benchmarks on it with no repercussions. Surprising that this isn't a business model for an overseas technology analyst firm.
rckoepke | 3 years ago
I'm certain someone in say, China or Russia, could pirate the database and run benchmarks on it with no repercussions. Surprising that this isn't a business model for an overseas technology analyst firm.
xen0|3 years ago
How much are you willing to pay for a legally dubious benchmark?
aaaaaaaaata|3 years ago
Or are they web content used to lure in new contracts?
mindslight|3 years ago
Person A installs database on a shared or to-be-sold computer, requires a license for the installation process to make a copy, "agrees" to EULA.
Person B then runs benchmarks on said computer, which does not require a license because no copy is being made, and publishes the results.
The only flaw in this is that Oracle will send its mafia enforcers to break your kneecaps despite not having a valid legal case. So you'll lose even if you technically can win.
eastbound|3 years ago
jkaplowitz|3 years ago
HideousKojima|3 years ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haynes_v._United_States
Convicted felons are exempt from the portion of the National Firearms Act that requires that machine guns (and other NFA items like short barreled shotguns) be registered as it would violate their 5th Amendment rights.
Xelbair|3 years ago