top | item 31729404

(no title)

nahname | 3 years ago

That is every project when the team is dysfunctional. Your language won't save you.

discuss

order

corrral|3 years ago

Some languages and ecosystems can be more helpful, though, even if none can save you. Rails is memorization-heavy and doesn't have static types to aid in navigation & reading. Its runtime auto-magic even resists grepping. Auto-imports mean you don't even get a decent list of which sources are contributing to a given file's behavior.

It's also the case that different teams can write it pretty differently, depending on gem choices and which Rails features they lean on. Plenty of other languages and ecosystems are like that, too, but all the above stuff means Rails is exceptionally bad, in that regard.

jshen|3 years ago

I’ve worked on a large rails code base for 10 years, with hundreds of developers. It hasn’t been any worse than any other language I’ve used.

The worst code bases I’ve worked on used statically typed Java.

Lio|3 years ago

> Rails is memorization-heavy and doesn't have static types to aid in navigation & reading.

Except of course that now it does.

So worst case if you inherit a codebase without static types added you can use gradual type as you get to know it.

fomine3|3 years ago

Same happens even on statically typed language: Spring