top | item 31733475

(no title)

EchoAce | 3 years ago

I strongly agree, in addition statements like "Before social media advertising would have to hitch a ride with some content produced for something else. Billboards, newspapers, television shows, and magazines all tried to provide a use value to their customers and audiences" are pretty incorrect. As bad as many people agree Facebook is for mental health, it was clearly created for and does provide value. The author does a fairly poor job of carrying out the argument without form-fitting irrelevant details to their desired narrative.

discuss

order

andrenotgiant|3 years ago

Yeah 100%. This article reads like the reddit.com/r/im14andthisisdeep/ version of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_economy

> Traditional advertising could never get your attention.

Are you serious?

> Before social media advertising would have to hitch a ride with some content produced for something else.

This is exactly what social media advertising does.

>Billboards, newspapers, television shows, and magazines all tried to provide a use value to their customers and audiences

What does that even mean?

Advertising was effectively getting attention and subverting behavior long before the internet. Watch the Century of the Self for some prime examples.