Obligatory XKCD: http://xkcd.com/605/
"As you can see, by late next month you'll have over four dozen husbands. Better get bulk rate on that wedding cake."
IMNSHO, the adoption of IE9 (on new computers with Win7 preinstalled, perhaps?) might make a significant dent in that projection. I've seen a very similar graph (starring Firefox) a few years back; and then IE came back from the dead with version 8.
Yeah, and there's always someone in April who's on pace to hit 80 home runs for the season. That said, I think the trend toward Chrome, and webkit browsers in general, is undeniable.
Ordinarily I downvote XKCD links on Hacker News, but in this particular case, it really does a perfect job of explaining what's wrong with the article.
Who cares? Whatever browser is the market leader doesn't matter because you will still need to support IE, Chrome, Firefox and Safari for the foreseeable future. Nobody has ever made a (significant) profit from a browser. In fact, Microsoft lost billions for their efforts (see U.S. vs. MSFT).
Can someone please explain to me why this matters?
In terms of affecting what devs need to do, it doesn't matter. However, if it happens (and it's a big if), it would certainly be noteworthy, because it will cement html standards-compliance.
As you say, you need to support IE, Chrome, FF and Safari - but (at least for IE < 8) this has always meant supporting the standard and then tweaking it to make it work in IE. I've never had significant differences in webpage functionality between chrome, FF and safari (YMMV). IE 9 is MUCH better at standards compliance - but this is purely because of MS's losses in marketshare.
If you don't see this as a significant thing, then I'm guessing you're too young to have been coding web pages when IE had a 90%+ market share. You kids have it easy. :-)
A large enough market share for Chrome means that developers can target more of the features in modern browsers. For example, companies can write WebGL games knowing that the majority of installed browsers support it. Google can add new features to Chrome and since everyone gets the automatic update, and Firefox will soon follow, the feature becomes mainstream.
yeah
that's too bad others already lost that war
even if IE, FF, Opera, etc became 2x better than Chrome overnight it wouldn't change a thing. The machine' rolling and advertised on 99% of the most visited pages, bundled with most software with default opt-in.
In 5 years from now we'll probably start saying how "maybe its not a good thing for ANY company to have 90%+ market share in something as important as the browser" and how "Yeah well Google didn't play fair, but that' ok cause we hated MS, and no one cared much about brand-fanboism for Opera or Firefox"
While what's in that "other" plot isn't listed, the Chrome and Firefox version schemes and their associated plethora of smaller and more frequent releases have played havoc with the classic version-plot scheme.
[+] [-] swombat|14 years ago|reply
As my maths teacher used to say, "even in the privacy of your own home, you should not extrapolate."
[+] [-] Piskvor|14 years ago|reply
IMNSHO, the adoption of IE9 (on new computers with Win7 preinstalled, perhaps?) might make a significant dent in that projection. I've seen a very similar graph (starring Firefox) a few years back; and then IE came back from the dead with version 8.
[+] [-] jamieforrest|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lloeki|14 years ago|reply
[0] http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-eu-monthly-200809-201107
[+] [-] chc|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tpatke|14 years ago|reply
Can someone please explain to me why this matters?
[+] [-] macavity23|14 years ago|reply
As you say, you need to support IE, Chrome, FF and Safari - but (at least for IE < 8) this has always meant supporting the standard and then tweaking it to make it work in IE. I've never had significant differences in webpage functionality between chrome, FF and safari (YMMV). IE 9 is MUCH better at standards compliance - but this is purely because of MS's losses in marketshare.
If you don't see this as a significant thing, then I'm guessing you're too young to have been coding web pages when IE had a 90%+ market share. You kids have it easy. :-)
[+] [-] melling|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ZeroGravitas|14 years ago|reply
Google are doing the same in reverse, making billions by pushing the web platform on the desktop and mobile.
[+] [-] k33n|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] codehalo|14 years ago|reply
I'm assuming you must be very young...
[+] [-] wavephorm|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mzarate06|14 years ago|reply
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-ww-monthly-200809-201110
The curves are even more revealing.
[+] [-] zobzu|14 years ago|reply
In 5 years from now we'll probably start saying how "maybe its not a good thing for ANY company to have 90%+ market share in something as important as the browser" and how "Yeah well Google didn't play fair, but that' ok cause we hated MS, and no one cared much about brand-fanboism for Opera or Firefox"
[+] [-] Hoff|14 years ago|reply
"Other" (which is massively increased) and IE9 are the only increasing entries in this plot:
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-monthly-200809...
While what's in that "other" plot isn't listed, the Chrome and Firefox version schemes and their associated plethora of smaller and more frequent releases have played havoc with the classic version-plot scheme.
[+] [-] ootachi|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ZeroGravitas|14 years ago|reply
But like the combined version share, what you can use is often more about the people holding you back on IE 6,7,8 than the ones pushing you forward.