It is a claim without proof which discredits people failing in a remote job. Comes pretty close to an insult TBH. Considering that success and failure in remote jobs does depend a lot on the team, the organization, the planning etc.. not only the person itself.
Also e.g. this sentence by GP raised red flags for me:
> Most software engineers produce more effort than they’re worth and skate by with meetings, “pair programming”, etc
Let's leave meetings out because I agree that too many meetings are bad but pair programming can be a useful tool, especially to transfer knowledge. And that MOST SWEs produce more effort than they're worth.. lol.. what a blanket statement.
fileeditview|3 years ago
Also e.g. this sentence by GP raised red flags for me:
> Most software engineers produce more effort than they’re worth and skate by with meetings, “pair programming”, etc
Let's leave meetings out because I agree that too many meetings are bad but pair programming can be a useful tool, especially to transfer knowledge. And that MOST SWEs produce more effort than they're worth.. lol.. what a blanket statement.
l30n4da5|3 years ago
It was an opinion. Given based on someone's anecdotal experience.
I'll stand by my original statement regarding whether that is a personal attack:
> No it isn't.
___
> lol.. what a blanket statement.
agreed on that point. I believe that statement definitely missed the mark, imo.