top | item 31997936

(no title)

ShortStretto | 3 years ago

Don't think I got that far but the thoguht process is not hard to follow. One person is gonna die either way so it might as well be the "better" option.

discuss

order

Markoff|3 years ago

Except it's not up to you to decide which of these two will die, both lives are equal and you must perform action to kill the littering guy, if you do nothing someone will die anyway, it just won't be the littering guy.

Hamuko|3 years ago

>Except it's not up to you to decide which of these two will die

I'm standing next to the track switcher, so I'd argue that it is.

McBeige|3 years ago

Heck yeah it's my decision! I don't want to live in a world where decisions are made like this, but in this case we must accept our role as the lever puller. Or walk away I guess, but that's no different from actively condemning the litterless person.

Tepix|3 years ago

What if the problem is rephrased and inaction would mean death for both?