top | item 32009009

Life Stats

270 points| memorable | 3 years ago |neal.fun

64 comments

order
[+] LouisSayers|3 years ago|reply
This is cool, simple but fun.

One improvement I'd suggest is using an international date format (yyyy / mm / dd) or perhaps a dropdown for months.

Even with the date placeholder text I managed to mess up the date!

[+] yitchelle|3 years ago|reply
Even on the simple site like this, even the contentious topic of implementation of dates pops up. :-). The dates are a pain to do well and agreeable to everyone.
[+] morninglight|3 years ago|reply
Don't feel bad, you are not alone.

At least the width of the YYYY entry box could be twice that of the MM and the DD boxes.

[+] layer8|3 years ago|reply
It took that comment to realize why the form wasn’t working for me.
[+] fandorin|3 years ago|reply
Yeah, I messed up the date as well. drop down would be perfect :)
[+] superb-owl|3 years ago|reply
This is beautiful. It reminds me of the early Internet, but done in a contemporary style.

I wish the modern Internet were more like this.

[+] parasti|3 years ago|reply
Perhaps it already is, but discovery is terrible.
[+] pidusd|3 years ago|reply
For folks born after 2020 (I wasn't; my kid was), lots of NaN's. Quite literally; uncertain times.
[+] theandrewbailey|3 years ago|reply
I didn't know that the numbers of grandmothers are rapidly increasing.
[+] ASalazarMX|3 years ago|reply
It's OK, they probably can't read or validate the results anyway.
[+] bergenty|3 years ago|reply
Wow two consecutive days on the front page Neal Agarwal. I don’t think I’ve seen that before.
[+] mikewarot|3 years ago|reply
I'm surprised and sad that 15% of my cohort is dead already. 8(

It says a dollar in the year I was born (1963) is the same as $8.4 today

As a reminder to myself about the meaning of hard money... I carry around a 1901 dollar... minted in New Orleans, that you might have got as change in 1963.... that's worth $19.20 melt value today. More than twice the $8.4 amount.

Not in my wallet is a 1852 dollar... worth $84.48 today in melt value. It's too soft, and too darned tiny.

[+] growt|3 years ago|reply
For me (1981) it's already 9%. That would mean that approx. 1 in 10 friends would already have died. I don't think thats remotely true for me. Most likely the global distribution of deaths is really uneven.
[+] ASalazarMX|3 years ago|reply
I'll start to worry when the rich and famous of my cohort start dying. They usually have the best medical care you can buy, and when they start dying, it would mean my time is probably near too.
[+] bertdc|3 years ago|reply
> You're one of the lucky ones. 8% of people born in 1986 didn't make it to 2022.

Would love to see the source and a breakdown of causes

[+] steve_adams_86|3 years ago|reply
That population increase statistic was a little shocking (+2.7B in our lifetimes). I suppose I knew it already, but it hadn’t clicked how crazy that is.
[+] elil17|3 years ago|reply
It’s hard to give an exact answer without more granular data than I can find given that it changes year to year. However, very approximately:

0.5 percentage points (pp) infant deaths (birth defects, delivery complications, neonatal death, etc.) 6.5 pp deaths under 5 from infectious disease (primarily pneumonia and diarrheal diseases) 0.5 pp injuries (fairly evenly split among homicide, suicide, drowning, road accidents, other accidents, but with the last two taking somewhat larger shares)

Over the next decades most in your cohort will die from heart disease, stroke, or COPD.

[+] Semaphor|3 years ago|reply
Directly followed by

> And you still have a long way to go.

> Who knows what else will happen in your lifetime?

I feel slightly threatened ;)

[+] zeropoint46|3 years ago|reply
Me too, I was 1984 and it was the same percentage.
[+] DocTomoe|3 years ago|reply
Given it's 9% for my cohort (1980), I'd say childhood mortality is mostly focussed on the first year.
[+] dasil003|3 years ago|reply
Wait, the human body makes a million red blood cells a second? That's kind of mind blowing.
[+] layer8|3 years ago|reply
The human body has 20-30 trillion red blood cells, roughly 80% of the total cell count in the body. So it’s not that surprising.
[+] rbinv|3 years ago|reply
That's what surprised me, too. Our bodies don't really "feel" all that active (even on a cellular level).
[+] bergenty|3 years ago|reply
The S&P is up 1000%+ since I was born. I hope the $100,000 I put in an index fund for my daughter when she was born recently has the same performance.
[+] nichos|3 years ago|reply
And inflation slows down!
[+] shannifin|3 years ago|reply
I put in that I was born in 1901, and it still told me that I still had "a long way to go"
[+] yial|3 years ago|reply
Whose woods these are I think I know. His house is in the village though; He will not see me stopping here To watch his woods fill up with snow.

My little horse must think it queer To stop without a farmhouse near Between the woods and frozen lake The darkest evening of the year.

He gives his harness bells a shake To ask if there is some mistake. The only other sound’s the sweep Of easy wind and downy flake.

The woods are lovely, dark and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep.

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/42891/stopping-by-woo...

[+] ASalazarMX|3 years ago|reply
Did the same, was surprised that 1% of my 121 yo cohort was still alive.
[+] sushid|3 years ago|reply
Nothing wrong with being a glass is .05% full kind of a person :)
[+] mnsh|3 years ago|reply
Experience on mobile is quite smooth. Thanks for sharing!
[+] adius|3 years ago|reply
[+] SaleFord|3 years ago|reply
This is super interesting. But, if anything, it had the opposite effect on me to what was intended.

I'm 25, and I've been a bit stressed recently about how I've been working in the same company since I was 19 (took a year out and graduated uni when I was 21). I've started to feel like I've been wasting my 20s not taking enough opportunities or not seeking a more exciting job, just settling for one that's relaxing and good enough for now.

Seeing just how tiny my career has been so far, in comparison to retirement age, really made me reflect how things aren't that bad. I've got plenty of time to enjoy a comfy job and make some money before I go off taking crazy risks.

[+] robjan|3 years ago|reply
I think this one is a lot less positive
[+] ASalazarMX|3 years ago|reply
"You're one of the lucky ones. 99% of people born in 1901 didn't make it to 2022."

Congratulations to the stubborn 121 year old keeping that 100% away. "And you still have a long way to go".

[+] huzeifadawood|3 years ago|reply
I can't click the Go button after entering the date. I am on Firefox.
[+] bigDinosaur|3 years ago|reply
Beware, it uses Month/Day/Year which is some strange format hopefully nobody else uses.
[+] doctaj|3 years ago|reply
Same issue for me. Tried mm dd yyyy - still didn’t work.

Edit: I was trying to add 2022 as the year, which didn’t work. Changing that made it work.

[+] rishikeshs|3 years ago|reply
Well this happened to me. You would have inputted date in the month field. The format is MMDDYYYY.

There is no warning shows for the validation

[+] wfme|3 years ago|reply
No such issue here on v100.0.1.
[+] bnegreve|3 years ago|reply
> Life expectancy went up 10 years for all people.

This is strangely misleading.

[+] wink|3 years ago|reply
If you look at the life expectancy statistics there's usually one chart based on your current age, and incidentally I looked this up just two days ago. I am close to 40 and have an average of ~40 years to live. If I was 40y old at the time I was born, it was only about ~30 years left. At least that's my interpretation of this sentence in there.
[+] astonfred|3 years ago|reply
Love it! And happy to be among the lucky ones who survived to this day from the early 70s ;-)
[+] chuckmpierce|3 years ago|reply
Apparently it can’t handle dates in 2020. Got a lot of NaNs…