top | item 32019384 (no title) Hates_ | 3 years ago WSJ has a piece on it. A third of the talent team, which affects fewer than 100. https://www.wsj.com/articles/twitter-lays-off-third-of-talen... discuss order hn newest dmix|3 years ago Explains why this is being posted on Linkedin like it's a blog. itslennysfault|3 years ago makes sense. They've been in a hiring freeze for a while now. Not much sense paying recruiters to sit on their hands I guess. coffeeblack|3 years ago Also, they need to remove the ideologists there first, if they want to be able to replace the ideologists in other positions. load replies (3) honkdaddy|3 years ago Slightly controversial, but I think most companies could cut the fat from their talent team by 30% and their hiring pipeline would not change. I’ve seen firsthand how a lot of recruiters operate and it’s remarkable how inefficient they can be.
itslennysfault|3 years ago makes sense. They've been in a hiring freeze for a while now. Not much sense paying recruiters to sit on their hands I guess. coffeeblack|3 years ago Also, they need to remove the ideologists there first, if they want to be able to replace the ideologists in other positions. load replies (3)
coffeeblack|3 years ago Also, they need to remove the ideologists there first, if they want to be able to replace the ideologists in other positions. load replies (3)
honkdaddy|3 years ago Slightly controversial, but I think most companies could cut the fat from their talent team by 30% and their hiring pipeline would not change. I’ve seen firsthand how a lot of recruiters operate and it’s remarkable how inefficient they can be.
dmix|3 years ago
itslennysfault|3 years ago
coffeeblack|3 years ago
honkdaddy|3 years ago