(no title)
pweezy | 3 years ago
Seems like it would avoid a lot of the issues like atmospheric interference, frequency congestion, and careful placement of receiver infrastructure.
pweezy | 3 years ago
Seems like it would avoid a lot of the issues like atmospheric interference, frequency congestion, and careful placement of receiver infrastructure.
jvanderbot|3 years ago
However, when using laser comms, sometimes a delay does make sense.
herendin|3 years ago
Pointed outwards towards what?
And I don't understand how that solves atmosphere interference issues. Still gotta go through the atmosphere at least twice for ground to ground
In actual fact, I believe the long term Starlink plan does include satellites in higher orbits, but I don't know their role
Lowest long distance latency is potentially a big competitive advantage for Starlink, so they'll probably try to get the shortest ground to ground path for some high priority customer data, and higher orbits on the signal path will detract from that goal
bythreads|3 years ago
Imagine the resolution of that array as it spins around earth...