That was the whole point of the article - the process of <dealing with thing> was delightful because <thing needer> dealt with a <thing provider> that gave a shit.
Yeah I know but in this case whether or not <dealing with thing> is delightful is undermined by the consideration that giving a shit about <thing> in the first place seems counterproductive for <thing needer>.
Clearly there needs to be shit giving limits for both counterparties regardless of <thing>.
CoolGuySteve|3 years ago
Clearly there needs to be shit giving limits for both counterparties regardless of <thing>.