Because the infrastructure needed would be bonkers, and creating fuelibg stations is not really a solved problem. You also loose a big amount of energy converting from electric to hydrogen and back. The cars themselves almost always have low storage because the tanks are very big. Hydrogen car performance is also a lot lower then pure EV.
93po|3 years ago
martin_bech|3 years ago
Again the scale of hydrogen fueling stations needed would be massive
b112|3 years ago
You're wrong.
And claims of energy loss!! Sure, no loss to heat in batteries? And batteries lose charge if they sit idle!
freemint|3 years ago
MerelyMortal|3 years ago
Upgrading fueling stations seems much easier than mining all of the copper needed to add all of the extra lines for EV charging, and then upgrading the whole national grid.
Supposedly one company has claimed 95% efficiency on creating hydrogen from electrolysis:
https://newatlas.com/energy/hysata-efficient-hydrogen-electr...
Power that by nuclear energy, and it's a green & clean winner.
bryanlarsen|3 years ago
JumpCrisscross|3 years ago
Hydrogen is a smart hedge to pursue. But thank goodness it’s mostly Japanese tax dollars doing it.
vel0city|3 years ago
Their homes were built expecting them to be able to pull 150-200A of power. It doesn't take that much power to charge an EV overnight. Mine charges way faster than it needs to on 32A 240V.