(no title)
jheitmann | 3 years ago
Also, why were non-linear smears thought to be desirable? Googling just turns up hand-wavy phrases like "easier on clients".
jheitmann | 3 years ago
Also, why were non-linear smears thought to be desirable? Googling just turns up hand-wavy phrases like "easier on clients".
hocuspocus|3 years ago
I found more details and motivation in this article: https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/06/01/five-different...
almog|3 years ago
My only guess is that because smearing takes place at Stratum 2, if the network partitions part of the NTP servers downstream (Stratum 3+), they'll have an offset as large as T/(17 x 3600) (T being the partition duration in seconds). Yet I guess it must be something else for I cannot see why that won't be tolerable.
More generally AFAIK the NTP RFC does not include smearing period, which is why the best practices are to only use smearing in a well controlled environment rather than on public facing NTP networks, but why is this not something that can be fixed? I'm not sure.
randyrand|3 years ago
> current non-smear time
This is the server that keeps that time! ;)
But IMO, the time keeping device should be a separate hardware module with battery backup that is never is restarted.
The computer should not be keeping time to begin with.