(no title)
Hayarotle | 3 years ago
The difference is purely ontological in this case. Both emergent materialism and this form of panpsychism would claim your aggregate consciousness has its origin in your brain and would stop if the parts of your brain were separated: both are compatible with physical reality. The difference is that the former would interpret this as a complete disappearance of such consciousness, while the latter would interpret it as a dis-aggregation of this consciousness into proto-conscious parts.
There are also some versions of eliminative materialism that claim consciousness doesn't exist in the first place, and myriads of other positions.
layer8|3 years ago
Hayarotle|3 years ago
That's part of why it can be attractive to leave aside concerns about metaphysical consciousness altogether.