[njcgbc]

> Businesses equate recessions with reduced demand for goods and and services, yet demand remains strong

This isn't true, major retailers have been reporting falling demand.

I'd cite the WSJ but for some reason I can't paste the link in this box, just Google "falling demand Wal-Mart"

> enough to push prices and profits to record levels.

Adjust both for inflation

[bushbaba]

Falling demand of non-necessities. People aren't buying "TVs". Which as you call out, is a stupidly strong recessionary signal.

[InefficientRed]

Or, damn near every household bought a new TV during the pandemic lockdowns using their stimulus checks and now no one needs a new TV.

I think Walmart's story in particular is one of stupidly bad demand forecasting.

[kube-system]

Not across the board. Demand for consumer discretionary spending outside of the home is up. People are tired of sitting at home. They don’t want to buy a TV and binge Netflix. They did that for 2 years. They’re going out to eat, going on vacation. Trying to get on a flight.

[babypuncher]

But demand for services and "experiences" is way up.

I think it's unrealistic to expect retail goods to maintain the same highs they had during the pandemic. For a big chunk of the last two years, people couldn't go to concerts, bars and restaurants operated at limited capacity, vacation destinations had travel restrictions in place, etc. This lead people to take the discretionary income they would normally spend on those things and put it into retail goods that improve their lives stuck at home. TVs, game consoles, what have you. Now that restrictions are essentially nonexistent in the US, people are returning to those pre-COVID activities.

[cma]

But people bought more TVs than normal during the pandemic, so it may also be part 'satiation' signal.

[InefficientRed]

> This isn't true, major retailers have been reporting falling demand.

As OP said,

>> and services.

> Wal-Mart

WalMart's issue is that they have a massive inventory/demand mismatch. They already have the headwind of a shift from goods to services, and then on top of that they also massively mismanaged a shift in consumer preference within goods. I have a feeling that they are also feeling the squeeze from Amazon. Many households treat Prime as a fixed cost but the 20 minute drive out to Walmart is a real expense that can be substituted with Amazon purchases. Tonight's earnings will be interesting.

Compare to eg Visa [1].

I expect that the "last hoorah" spending of this summer will grind to a halt in the winter and by Q2 2023 we'll be able to see a massive decline in consumer spending during Q4 in particular.

But we aren't there yet, at least in aggregate, because consumers are spending like mad on services.

[1] https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/visa-quarterly-prof...

[p_j_w]

>I'd cite the WSJ but for some reason I can't paste the link in this box, just Google "falling demand Wal-Mart"

I'd rather not base my picture of the entire economy around a single retailer. What's going on with other retailers? Amazon, Best Buy, Target, etc? Have they more than picked up the slack that Wal Mart is seeing?

[InefficientRed]

> I'd rather not base my picture of the entire economy around a single retailer

Or retailers in general. Retail spending is down because services spending is up -- people are going to the beach and buying plane tickets instead of buying TVs and patio furniture.

Regardless of whether we're in a recession, retailer numbers aren't a good indicator for the duration/depth/type. We spent all of 2020 hearing that demand was pulled forward. Well, it was pulled forward from somewhere, and now we are there.

> What's going on with other retailers?

Best Buy missed by a lot; sales down by over 10%; forecast was a 1% contraction.

Amazon tonight. Always complicated because of AWS, digital content, and now a substantial advertising business. If you want the retail details you have to go past the headline numbers.

Target in mid-August but expectations are similar.

My guess is that none of those companies will be hit has bad as Walmart because (1) Walmart was just particularly badly mismanaged, and (2) these other companies are just different in kind (particularly Amazon -- they could eg suffer retail losses while beating estimates on Advertising/Cloud)