(no title)
_xrp0 | 3 years ago
Many people are bad at evaluating themselves. I've seen countless posts by juniors apparently "grinding hard" to get a job, and you just take 1 look at their resume and everything makes sense. Zero research on how to write resumes, zero prep, projects are garbage, shotgunning on indeed without some creativity etc.
PainfullyNormal|3 years ago
Can you define both what "horribly wrong" looks like and what "not horribly wrong" looks like? Because I can't.
The problem with a "proven track record" is that nobody believes what you write on your resume and nobody wants to bother looking at your code. That leaves hiring on "feel" and I have no idea what somebody needs to put in their cover letter and/or resume to "feel" right to a recruiter, an HR rep and a hiring manager all at the same time.
_xrp0|3 years ago
That's nonsense.
It's quite straightforward actually: go through the CVs of engineers working at top companies and look how their resume looks different from yours.
Chances are that they're actually selling themselves properly, using lots of jargon, using strong action verbs, and following the advice that has shown to work for the last decade.
jongjong|3 years ago
My record is impeccable. I build highly reliable software fast both as part of a group or as a solo freelancer. Much of my work is in the public domain on GitHub so it's easy to verify all this and check my code quality, automated tests and PR review history.
_xrp0|3 years ago
One question though: how many of those years 10 years have you worked in a full-time position?
ipaddr|3 years ago
_xrp0|3 years ago
None of this has ANY effect on competent software engineers. Most of my peers keep getting massive offers left and right. Nothing has changed for them.