The restrictions are tied to geography not persons.
A Puerto Rican in California is entitled to all the benefits of US Citizenship whereas a Californian in Puerto Rico is not. Mostly these are related to welfare and elections. This would be the case for the Californian or Puerto Rican living anywhere in the world outside the US.
It's remarkable that you said all of this, I'll be generous and say that someone else completely made up the part about the Jones Act and you just heard them and repeated it.
hunterb123|3 years ago
So I wouldn't really consider citizens of US territories full US citizens.
So maybe it's more appropriate to say they aren't Americans, but they are US citizens.
But that is all semantics. My main point was the reason they don't have US representation is they don't have US taxation.
SllX|3 years ago
A Puerto Rican in California is entitled to all the benefits of US Citizenship whereas a Californian in Puerto Rico is not. Mostly these are related to welfare and elections. This would be the case for the Californian or Puerto Rican living anywhere in the world outside the US.
thaumasiotes|3 years ago
The District of Columbia has to pay US taxes without being allowed any US representation.
samatman|3 years ago
nautilius|3 years ago