(no title)
mikecx | 3 years ago
The article says that octopi is the plural of octopus, but it's actually octopuses. Octopus is originally Greek, not Latin and thus does not get the Latin plural -i, but instead would get the Greek plural -odes. Since it ends in a way English can deal with, the commonly accepted usage is octopuses (English) over octopodes (Greek) with octopi being the least correct.
https://qz.com/1446229/let-us-finally-resolve-the-octopuses-...
robotguy|3 years ago
I used to be a stickler for correct vocabulary usage and then I saw a documentary about dictionaries (can't remember what it was) and someone from OED said basically this (from https://www.oed.com/public/oed3guide/guide-to-the-third-edit...):
Now I think it's something that is just fun to argue about, but I don't take any of it seriously.(edited for formatting)
o_____________o|3 years ago
etskinner|3 years ago
To wit: A blog post from Merriam-Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/the-many-plura...
exolymph|3 years ago
dalmo3|3 years ago
gweinberg|3 years ago
BurningFrog|3 years ago
I really dislike the latin plural rule, that some misguided but powerful people decided on centuries ago.
"Indexes" is much more natural English than "indices", and we should, when possible, use those those forms.
adhesive_wombat|3 years ago
I don't think a particularly convincing reason was advanced other then "technical things are more Latin-adjacent".
Tao3300|3 years ago
What a silly thing to say! Where does this poor fool think language comes from?
This is one of the cringiest Well-Actually-isms. It tries to look pedantic while completely missing the point.
hackernewds|3 years ago
paulcole|3 years ago
aidenn0|3 years ago
seventytwo|3 years ago
HmOh6WbJ|3 years ago
deepspace|3 years ago
robotguy|3 years ago