You are absolutely right. What it comes down to, however, is consent by the individual. Data will not be shared without your permission. We will make sure our legal language is clearer here.
I think what people are getting at is that the legal language can be changed after an acquisition and our previously-safe data is now owned by a less scrupulous entity.
But what data? All of it or some subset? Aggregated, differentially privatised, non-identifiable chunks?
Without specific explanations, you could always weasel out of vague promises.
Sorry to sound negative. I'd love a service like this, but there's a very high bar for responsible implementation (in my opinion) and VC seems very unlikely to be compatible with responsibility.
Basically, what is your business model? Are you only making money from subscriptions, or through other means? What are the VC's expectations?
You went from "this is not possible" to "will not be shared without your permission" in one reply sequence. This whole thread is covered with people noting your website's doublespeak.
I think you need to stop for a bit and think about what ethical behavior is.
deegles|3 years ago
austinjp|3 years ago
Without specific explanations, you could always weasel out of vague promises.
Sorry to sound negative. I'd love a service like this, but there's a very high bar for responsible implementation (in my opinion) and VC seems very unlikely to be compatible with responsibility.
Basically, what is your business model? Are you only making money from subscriptions, or through other means? What are the VC's expectations?
foobiekr|3 years ago
I think you need to stop for a bit and think about what ethical behavior is.