top | item 32357465 (no title) Vanderson | 3 years ago Same here. I am really, really hopeful there is a drop in replacement for ULIDs if they ever get abandoned. discuss order hn newest ywain|3 years ago I expect the new UUID formats (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peabody-dispatch...) to fill that need once they get standardized and made available in standard libraries or popular packages. BiteCode_dev|3 years ago Especially UUID7, it it becomes standard, ULID won't be necessary anymore, unless you want a shorted text representation.But ULID exists right now, UUID7 is still in the making. Sytten|3 years ago The last draft expired without any consensus so I dont have high hopes for this one. We will see. BiteCode_dev|3 years ago It's not a very complicated algorithm, they can't get abandoned, you can always recode it, and use it.
ywain|3 years ago I expect the new UUID formats (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peabody-dispatch...) to fill that need once they get standardized and made available in standard libraries or popular packages. BiteCode_dev|3 years ago Especially UUID7, it it becomes standard, ULID won't be necessary anymore, unless you want a shorted text representation.But ULID exists right now, UUID7 is still in the making. Sytten|3 years ago The last draft expired without any consensus so I dont have high hopes for this one. We will see.
BiteCode_dev|3 years ago Especially UUID7, it it becomes standard, ULID won't be necessary anymore, unless you want a shorted text representation.But ULID exists right now, UUID7 is still in the making.
Sytten|3 years ago The last draft expired without any consensus so I dont have high hopes for this one. We will see.
BiteCode_dev|3 years ago It's not a very complicated algorithm, they can't get abandoned, you can always recode it, and use it.
ywain|3 years ago
BiteCode_dev|3 years ago
But ULID exists right now, UUID7 is still in the making.
Sytten|3 years ago
BiteCode_dev|3 years ago