I said he isn’t controversial now and not in the past. Key word is “and”. Both things aren’t both true. According to you, you have now slandered me by twisting my words. According to you, that’s evil.
How do you think I have so many specific examples of Peterson? I’m speaking from specific examples of hearing him speak.
You did a whole thing of what you find slanderous. You didn’t explain why. Everything you write are some vague stuff. Nothing specific or substantive.
Are you saying Peterson isn’t a raging bigot against lgbtq people? I’ll stick to one example because you consistently do not respond to any specific critiques. I gave examples of Peterson specifically being a bigot against lgbtq people. Including very recently with his Kulinski interview.
Either he is or he isn’t a bigot [against lgbtq people].
> Are you sure it serves you to hold the opinions of him that you do?
Him being a bigot isn’t an opinion. It’s quite messed up imo to call his homophobia and transphobia “my opinion”. You’re insulting a whole lot of lgbtq people. Some would think that’s basically evil.
—
You’re afraid thing doesn’t make sense. He hadn’t helped a whole ton of people in 2016 yet. He wasn’t famous when he began his narrative BS on the pronoun bill. Having a made up narrative concerning someone like me isn’t good. Some would think what you are saying is basically evil.
I don't think we should continue this debate here, its not appropriate for HN as evidenced by our comments getting flagged.
The last thing I will say is that I am still very confused why and how you can say he isn't controversial. I am starting to wonder if we are using the same definition of controversial...
skinnymuch|3 years ago
How do you think I have so many specific examples of Peterson? I’m speaking from specific examples of hearing him speak.
You did a whole thing of what you find slanderous. You didn’t explain why. Everything you write are some vague stuff. Nothing specific or substantive.
Are you saying Peterson isn’t a raging bigot against lgbtq people? I’ll stick to one example because you consistently do not respond to any specific critiques. I gave examples of Peterson specifically being a bigot against lgbtq people. Including very recently with his Kulinski interview.
Either he is or he isn’t a bigot [against lgbtq people].
> Are you sure it serves you to hold the opinions of him that you do?
Him being a bigot isn’t an opinion. It’s quite messed up imo to call his homophobia and transphobia “my opinion”. You’re insulting a whole lot of lgbtq people. Some would think that’s basically evil.
—
You’re afraid thing doesn’t make sense. He hadn’t helped a whole ton of people in 2016 yet. He wasn’t famous when he began his narrative BS on the pronoun bill. Having a made up narrative concerning someone like me isn’t good. Some would think what you are saying is basically evil.
8vectors|3 years ago
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/22/what-t...
Or even better... this:
https://medium.com/the-hit-job/why-jordan-peterson-is-not-ne...
I don't think we should continue this debate here, its not appropriate for HN as evidenced by our comments getting flagged.
The last thing I will say is that I am still very confused why and how you can say he isn't controversial. I am starting to wonder if we are using the same definition of controversial...