Are you making software that has the explicit stated purpose of facilitating illegal money laundering, like these crypto mixers openly say they do? If not, then you don't have anything to worry about from these sanctions.
Tornado Cash has never been for the "explicit stated purpose of facilitating illegal money laundering" but for being able to remain private about what transactions you make on the blockchain. As long as you file your taxes correctly, it wouldn't be illegal to use services like Tornado Cash.
Plenty of people use services like that to move funds from their cold wallet to their hot one, in order to not make visible to the public how much funds they have. Again, as long as you properly file taxes, this should not be a issue.
And yeah, some people do work on privacy-preserving services that can and will be used for bad purposes. Anything involving E2E encryption is usually made for privacy reasons, is this bad enough for you to say the same thing about it? What about things that can be used to skirt copyright like youtube-dl, do they deserve the same treatment?
> Tornado Cash has never been for the "explicit stated purpose of facilitating illegal money laundering" but for being able to remain private about what transactions you make on the blockchain.
Isn't that literally what money laundering is?
> As long as you file your taxes correctly, it wouldn't be illegal to use services like Tornado Cash.
IIRC, money laundering businesses pay their taxes too (e.g. the Breaking Bad car wash pretended the drug profits came from washing cars, and paid taxes those "car washing" profits).
This isn't warrantless surveillance, it's people breaking the law in the open. You can believe tornado cash should be legal but still, be realistic: Most OSS doesn't have tornado cash's risk profile
Yes, if your business engages in plainly illegal activity that relies on a letter of exemption from the relevant regulator, and if you don't abide by the terms of that letter, then the evil government might capriciously decide to shut you down.
capableweb|3 years ago
Plenty of people use services like that to move funds from their cold wallet to their hot one, in order to not make visible to the public how much funds they have. Again, as long as you properly file taxes, this should not be a issue.
And yeah, some people do work on privacy-preserving services that can and will be used for bad purposes. Anything involving E2E encryption is usually made for privacy reasons, is this bad enough for you to say the same thing about it? What about things that can be used to skirt copyright like youtube-dl, do they deserve the same treatment?
tablespoon|3 years ago
Isn't that literally what money laundering is?
> As long as you file your taxes correctly, it wouldn't be illegal to use services like Tornado Cash.
IIRC, money laundering businesses pay their taxes too (e.g. the Breaking Bad car wash pretended the drug profits came from washing cars, and paid taxes those "car washing" profits).
Jabrov|3 years ago
kevingadd|3 years ago
bequanna|3 years ago
It seems that regulators can change their position at any time. See the recent example PredictIt.
jeffbee|3 years ago
froh_away|3 years ago
[deleted]