top | item 32397057

(no title)

dingleberry420 | 3 years ago

> The argument probably is that they assisted a sanctioned entity by providing a contribution i.e. service to it.

And what if they did so before the sanctions? Is the US so happy to retroactively punish people who literally did nothing wrong?

discuss

order

JumpCrisscross|3 years ago

> people who literally did nothing wrong?

What on earth did people think a tumbler like Tornado Cash was going to be used for and by?

toolz|3 years ago

You ask this as if there are only non-legitimate uses. Do you think businesses often give away their revenue data to their competitors for free? Of course not, so if you want to do business on an open ledger then you have to have a way to obscure transactions so that your competition doesn't get to know exactly what your revenue stream looks like.

There's nothing sinister about privacy. It would be a logical fallacy to assume that just because sinister things happen in private that privacy itself is sinister.

dingleberry420|3 years ago

Not sure, thoughtcrime is a thing now in modern America?