[ajenner]

As I remember it, the term "XT class" was used back in the day to distinguish between "AT class" PCs and those prior - i.e. to mean an IBM PC, XT or comparable machine. So (weirdly enough) the 5150 was considered XT class despite predating the XT (they're almost identical as far as software is concerned anyway). The term "PC class" wasn't a thing because PC came to be shorthand for any IBM PC/XT/AT or later x86 machine. Some more powerful machines like the Amstrad PC1512 (with an 8MHz 8086) were also considered XT class - these machines could run games like Bruce Lee and Digger which were designed for the PC/XT (and which were too fast on AT and later machines), though the gameplay was quicker than they were designed for so were extra-challenging.

[viler]

Yeah, that seemed to be the usage in most contemporary literature/magazines. There are also those other architectural factors like the bus width, the number of PICs, the keyboard subsystem and so on, which is why you could have "XT-class" 8086 and even 286 machines (like a Tandy 1000 model or two).

[Scali]

What may also have had an impact was that clones were generally XT-clones (using the newer, smaller ISA card layout, and no cassette port), not PC-clones. And indeed, they were specifically advertised as 'XT-clone', 'XT-class' and such. So the 5150 is really the oddball here. Back in the old days I understood the usage as follows: 'PC' was a catch-all term for all IBM PC-compatible machines that ran DOS. 'XT' was the term used for machines with an 8088 (or sometimes V20) CPU (and of course there was the 'Turbo XT' subclass for CPUs running at more than 4.77 MHz). 'AT' was the term for 286 machines. After that era, people just identified PCs by the CPU used, so you had '386es', '486es', 'Pentiums' etc.