Has anyone seen any good explanations or visualisations of how long term storage would be achieved? For instance in Britain solar in winter has 1/10th of the output in summer, and we can have lulls in wind output for many days at a time. Using these resources to reduce gas use makes sense, but our current plans call for about 30% of electricity generated from gas using carbon capture and storage. How would this be handled under a 100% renewable scenario? Is it just generating Hydrogen?Or it is that these intermittency gaps can be closed using long distance connectors? Has anyone done studies showing exactly where resources would need to be located and the length of connectors, modelled against weather and demand patterns?
gregwebs|3 years ago
jl6|3 years ago
There are also tons of other short-medium term storage solutions, and we probably need all of them that we can get our hands on, but hydrogen and ammonia are the ones that feel most likely to operate at grid scale.
pfdietz|3 years ago
ZeroGravitas|3 years ago
Suggests Great Britain would ideally have only 1% solar, and storing 8% of the wind production as Green Hydrogen
Doing it without Green Hydrogen, just solar wind batteries would double the cost.
Connectors help too, though they also cost money to build. As renewables and batteries have plummeted in price, connectors have become less necessary. Once you have Green Hydrogen you can ship it around and store it like LNG.
andy_ppp|3 years ago
yisonPylkita|3 years ago
kitkat_new|3 years ago
Wind has higher output during winter
Brakenshire|3 years ago
https://www.energy-charts.info/charts/power/chart.htm?l=en&c...
If you connect wind production across regions the lulls can be averaged out, but I want to know how reliable that is and what distances are required.
naasking|3 years ago
Grid expansion can average over regional lulls. Renewables also need to be built to provide significant overcapacity. Storage can help, but you can do it with only those two.