Advocating perpetual motion is obviously out of bounds, interesting heterdox-to-heretic physics can be fun, but this article is crankery unbalanced by the perspective of anything in the mainstream.
I would rule it on the perpetual-motion side of the line of crap no one needs to waste time reading.
Or it just means the expansion factor isn't infinite, maybe ran out of energy to keep pushing outwards against whatever resistance from the outside or mass needed to overcome that resistance
and like a ball tied to a rubberband, it's may not be stalled but collapsing back over trillions of years, maybe the external force/mass is now overcoming the outward expansion like a bubble in a puddle
I am sure there are far better, educated theories but that's just mine.
samatman|3 years ago
Advocating perpetual motion is obviously out of bounds, interesting heterdox-to-heretic physics can be fun, but this article is crankery unbalanced by the perspective of anything in the mainstream.
I would rule it on the perpetual-motion side of the line of crap no one needs to waste time reading.
gerikson|3 years ago
- <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32434124> - Anti-Big Bang theory scientists face censorship by international journals
- <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32443298> - Scientists Protest Censorship in Cosmology
- <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32443476> - JWST Shows The Big Bang Didn’t Happen (dead)
- <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32436123> - The Big Bang didn't happen
dcminter|3 years ago
ck2|3 years ago
and like a ball tied to a rubberband, it's may not be stalled but collapsing back over trillions of years, maybe the external force/mass is now overcoming the outward expansion like a bubble in a puddle
I am sure there are far better, educated theories but that's just mine.