top | item 32487710

(no title)

teakettle42 | 3 years ago

That’s the theory, which, if you actually took to its logical conclusion, would result in treating and evaluating every individual as an individual, and the entire concept of group identity as a short-hand mechanism for assigning “intersecting identities” would have to be abandoned.

That’s not how it is applied in practice.

discuss

order

watwut|3 years ago

It does not logically follows at all. Nothing in what previous poster said prevents analysis of group behavior or treatment. It does not make it impossible to talk about race or gender or age - it only makes it less naive.

teakettle42|3 years ago

It makes it impossible to assign an individual identity — and evaluate individual behavior and status — as merely a function of their coarse-grained group membership.

raxxorraxor|3 years ago

It does not follow logically but it still is prudent to do exactly that for reasons that intersectionality doesn't have a perspective on.