top | item 32627363

(no title)

reallydontask | 3 years ago

> Books as a medium actively encourage unnecessary verbosity.

From memory that is the main thesis of this article by Sam Harris (from the article):

>If your book is 600 pages long, you are demanding more of my time than I feel free to give. And if I could accomplish the same change in my view of the world by reading a 60-page version of your argument, why didn’t you just publish a book this length instead?

https://www.samharris.org/blog/the-future-of-the-book

discuss

order

marginalia_nu|3 years ago

I feel this is a consequence of how cheap books have gotten to produce.

Older books, the sort that were copied by hand onto calf skin, tend to have a lot less meandering filler than contemporary literature.

adhesive_wombat|3 years ago

And the "web-first long form" medium positively drips with filler. Half the time it doesn't even mention the subject at hand for 500 words until a tortured anecdote or analogy has run out of steam, leaving you guessing what the article is even about in the first place. Then it carries on for another few thousand words, at least 70% of which are useless flourishes or word count padding.

falcolas|3 years ago

It’s also a consequence of programs like “Kindle Unlimited” where your pay as an author is directly tied to how many pages are read.

hackerlight|3 years ago

It's also that Paul Graham saying ~"books should be blog posts, blog posts should be tweets".

satysin|3 years ago

I recently read the book Atomic Habits by James Clear and felt exactly this. The book could have easily been one quarter the length and covered all the same material.

The contents of the book is quite good albeit not revolutionary. But it should have been around 60 pages not 270.

I actually found a fantastic short form version at https://www.chrisbehan.ca/posts/atomic-habits which is just as good as the book at explaining the concepts at a fraction of the read time. I advise anyone read that over the book.