(no title)
reallydontask | 3 years ago
From memory that is the main thesis of this article by Sam Harris (from the article):
>If your book is 600 pages long, you are demanding more of my time than I feel free to give. And if I could accomplish the same change in my view of the world by reading a 60-page version of your argument, why didn’t you just publish a book this length instead?
marginalia_nu|3 years ago
Older books, the sort that were copied by hand onto calf skin, tend to have a lot less meandering filler than contemporary literature.
adhesive_wombat|3 years ago
falcolas|3 years ago
hackerlight|3 years ago
dazc|3 years ago
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Longitude-Genius-Greatest-Scientifi...
satysin|3 years ago
The contents of the book is quite good albeit not revolutionary. But it should have been around 60 pages not 270.
I actually found a fantastic short form version at https://www.chrisbehan.ca/posts/atomic-habits which is just as good as the book at explaining the concepts at a fraction of the read time. I advise anyone read that over the book.