This is not necessarily a contradiction. The vast majority of people support “doing something to save the planet,” and a vast majority also support not being personally affected by that something. It leads to cognitive dissonance which shows up in surveys like these.
Correct, when told some catastrophe is happening, most will want to do something. However, disagreeing what that "something" should be hardly sounds like congnative dissonance.
Also the difficulty is not that a majority of people don’t want to do something about it but instead that well-organized minorities can block a solution.
You missed the whole point. The purpose of that scientific looking article was to convince you that climate change is caused by human activity, which in reality is not.
[+] [-] glitchc|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] no_where|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] PaulHoule|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aurora72|3 years ago|reply